[Tweeters] Fw: Migratory Birds Legislation in the US and Canada
B. A. Wolfe
gismybabe at yahoo.com
Sat Dec 11 17:25:10 PST 2004
Unfortunately, as long as we have extreme anti-environmentalists like the current administration that somehow got re-elected in this country, we will never get any kind of good protection laws going. As a matter of fact, the laws that are there are being quickly eroded by these people. And who helped re-elect them, and paid for their campaigns? Super wealthy people who can afford a $10,000,000+ condo like those that evicted Pale Male & Lola. Beglad that in Canada you have seen more liberal lawmakers in recent years, who actually do something to help the environment, but also never forget that even they leave much to be desired.
Brett A. Wolfe
"Wayne C. Weber" <contopus at telus.net> wrote:
The recent publicity about the destruction of the Red-tailed Hawk nest
adjacent to Central Park in New York City has underlined inadequacies
in the laws protecting raptor nests in the US-- or at least in the
interpretation of those laws.
Had a similar event occurred in Canada, it would probably have been
considered illegal, and there would have been at least a possibility
of prosecution of the persons responsible.
I am attaching a copy of a message I sent to the BIRDCHAT E-mail
group, which may interest those of you concerned about this issue.
Wayne C. Weber
contopus at telus.net
----- Original Message -----
From: Wayne C. Weber
Cc: BARRY KENT MCKAY ; MARCEL GAHBAUER
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 10:29 PM
Subject: Migratory Birds Legislation in the US and Canada
> Recent messages from Barry Kent McKay, Marcel Gahbauer, and others
> indicate some confusion about legislation protecting migratory birds
> in the US and Canada.
> The Migratory Birds Convention is a treaty signed between the US and
> Canada in 1916. However, a treaty is meaningless unless implemented
> legislation on each side of the border.
> The Migratory Birds Convention has been implemented by the Migratory
> Bird Treaty Act in the US, and the Migratory Birds Convention Act in
> Canada. The Canadian act was amended in 1994, and the 1994 version
> the current one. The two pieces of legislation have similar, but not
> identical, provisions. Even the list of species protected is not
> identical in the two countries.
> The interpretation of the provisions respecting the destruction of
> nests of protected species has been different in the two countries.
> was my understanding that, in the US, protection has always been
> extended only to active, occupied nests (i.e., those containing eggs
> or young). In Canada, protection has generally been extended to
> and inactive nests of species which reuse their nests year after
> (e.g. raptors, herons, cormorants, Cliff and Barn Swallows. However,
> this is an interpretation only, subject to court decisions, and is
> spelled out in the legislation per se.
> In British Columbia, for example, application of this policy to
> provincial highways has resulted in a cessation of the formerly
> widespread practice of removing Cliff Swallow nest from highway
> bridges outside of the breeding season.
> In a nutshell, it appears that the destruction of Pale Male's nest,
> while not illegal in the US, would have been considered illegal in
> Canada, and could have been the subject of a prosecution.
> The US has taken a narrow interpretation of the provision protecting
> nests of protected species, while Canada has taken a broader
> interpretation (although this provision is still widely ignored--
> witness the thousands of nests of migratory birds destroyed every
> year, without permits, in logging operations). What is needed, it
> seems, is a broader interpretation of the U.S. legislation, or else
> amendment to the legislation that extends protection for nests of
> bird species (such as raptors) to the non-breeding season.
> Wayne C. Weber
> Delta, BC
> contopus at telus.net
Tweeters mailing list
Tweeters at u.washington.edu
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Tweeters