[Tweeters] Osprey Nest Gone at 405 and 116th

Philip Dickinson pdickins at gmail.com
Wed Apr 6 14:06:10 PDT 2016


My question is whether such an action would violate the 98-year-old federal
Migratory Bird Treaty Act. It seems that it would unless a permit has been
granted.

Phil Dickinson
Lake Stevens

On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Snell Margaret <masnell at comcast.net> wrote:


> I passed by where the osprey had returned to the cell tower at I-405 and

> 116th St. in Kirkland about 2 pm today. A person was on top of the cell

> tower and whatever portion of a nest had been built had been removed. So I

> think the osprey is being encouraged to find a new home. Margaret

> Snell_______________________________________________

> Tweeters mailing list

> Tweeters at u.washington.edu

> http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/tweeters

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman1.u.washington.edu/pipermail/tweeters/attachments/20160406/57283b56/attachment-0002.htm


More information about the Tweeters mailing list